Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mark Lurinsky's avatar

As an Essex County resident somewhat active in Democratic politics for the last 7 years or so, I would like to see our county adopt procedures for candidate endorsement similar to what Morris County has just started. I would like to limit the unilateral power of a single party leader here.

But you article does more than that. It also suggests that somehow, because Brendan Gill has been the beneficiary of the support of Chair Leroi Jones and some prominent electeds, he must be regarded with suspicion as somehow the "machine controlled" candidate, or even perhaps, a "corporate" Dem.

My experience with Brendan Gill as he have been a member at large of the Essex County Commission and its president for two terms has been that he has actually been a very independent voice leading things in a positive and progressive direction. To give some specifics:

-- Brendan took up the challenge of getting new, very secure and minimally expensive voting machines for our county and we became the first NJ county to do it. I spoke for this at the time as an activist in BlueWaveNJ's electoral reform working group and so did leaders from SOMA Action. We were concerned that many of the counties were just going along with the inducements of the voting machine manufaturers who were wining and dining them and asking them to buy the most expensive systems.

--Brendan went against the County Executive's plan for a long-term renewal of the County Jail's contract with ICE as a method to balance our budget. Under his leadership, this deal was killed.

--This spring, myself and a few other tookd a resolution to Brendan demanding that our state's full congressional delegation stand up to oppose the Trump planned cuts to Medicaid and SNAP, in order to shed more light on this issue when people were not paying sufficient attention. Brendan took the lead and the resolution was enacted unanimously and then publicized. Undortunately, other county commissions controlled by Democrats were unwilling to take similar steps. (Bergen County comes to mind.)

--This fall, Brendan moved for an activist-created resolution supporting the Immigrant Trust Act, and it was similarly passed in our county. Again, we were the first county to do this.

Your selective mentions of Assemblywoman Alixon Collazos-Gill leaves the impression that she might similarly be "machine conrolled" or a "corporate" Dem. You were perhaps unaware that last year, in only her first term in the legislator, Assemblywoman Collazos-Gill was one of the very few to oppose the bill promoted by legislative leadership that loosened disclosure rules about election contributions and pay to play. (Definitely not a "go along" position.)

You have made a case that our county needs further reform about the way things happen. But I think your discsussion of the collatoral issue, whether Brendan Gill is an independent candidate or a "boss-controlled" one, was off base.

Please consider the possibilty that Leroi Jones and the others have simply recognized Brendan Gill as an important and consistent leader and decided, rather than trying to find a "controllable" person, to acquiesce in his candidacy and "get on the bus" before it leaves the station.

I hope you will take the opportunity to check in with activist members of SOMA Action to see if their experiences with Brendan Gill conform to mine. (I'm by no means settled in endorsing him or any of the other candidates at this point, but I would not like to see a wrong inference lead folks to discount his candidacy because of the actions of the County Committee.) Perhaps you may find reasons to correct what I think are mistaken inferences which many may draw from your article about this candidate.

Satenik Margaryan's avatar

Thank you! I was just reading about the lawsuit about the expedited timeline for the primary. Why is the machine so hell bent not to be democratic?!

5 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?